This question is predicated by a column heading in The
Times of June 5th entitled “...Now Lloyds faces £100 million fine
for PPI complaints mishandling...”
The
Financial Conduct Authority found the state-backed group had wrongly denied
compensation to customers over payment protection insurance (PPI) - the wider
scandal that has already cost Lloyds £12 billion.
I have repeatedly stated that the British banks behave as
if they are a law unto themselves, and they keep on proving me right.
They conduct themselves in the most blatantly
criminogenic manner, committing financial crimes on a wholesale basis. They
conduct themselves like early 20th century Mafiosi crime gangs, and
it appears that nothing can be done to bring them to heel!
Sorry,
someone help me please! What is this ‘mishandling’ we are now being told about?
It
relates to a period from March 2012 to May 2013 when the group assessed
customer complaints relating to more than 2.3 million PPI policies and rejected
37% of those - many of them wrongly.
Lloyds
apologised to customers affected.
Staff at Lloyds largest complaints handling centre were
deliberately and cynically being taught ways to ensure customers got the minimum
or no compensation, including initially rejecting claims, as many people, it
was believed, would not pursue the matter.
The FCA
found that in March 2012, Lloyds issued guidance to complaint handlers that its
overriding principle when assessing complaints should be that PPI sales
processes "were compliant and robust unless told otherwise".
This
resulted in some of them dismissing customers' personal accounts of what had
happened to them during the PPI sale.
In
addition, Lloyds did not notify complaint handlers of known failings that had
been identified in its PPI sales process.
Some
customers were told that their complaint had been "fully
investigated" when this was not the case.
Oh right, I’ve got it now, ‘mishandling’ is just another bankers’
weasel word for the deliberate and wilful ignoring of the regulator’s stated requirements
that the bank should recompense clients for the cynical and deliberate exercise
of fraud and criminality they had engaged in for years.
I mean, it was not as if Lloyds didn’t have form for
dragging their feet over paying back the money they had nicked from their
hapless clients. Only 2 years ago, Lloyds was fined £4.3 million for delays in
making compensation payments to more than 100,000 clients who had been
defrauded in the so-called PPI-mis-selling scam. (Mis-selling was another piece
of verbal double dealing, and meant fraud on an institutional scale)!
Clearly, that fine taught Lloyds not to do it again and
get into compliance, and this is what I mean when I pose the question; ‘What
can be done to get these bastards to toe the line?
Their response to their regulator was no doubt to issue a
lot of verbal garbage about putting customers first, and learning lessons from
the past, but in reality, they were merely sticking two fingers up at the FSA
and then the FCA, and carrying on ignoring the instructions of the regulator.
The big problem is that the regulatory agencies must
start to behave as if they really do mean business and stop mealy-mouthing about
what they see as their regulatory responsibility.
They have a raft of penalties available to them,
including one which enables them to define an individual in the industry as
‘not fit and proper’ to have the control of a regulated entity.
I believe that this finding ought to be directed at every
member of the Lloyds main board, and they should start packing their bags
immediately and clearing their desks. They have openly connived at PPI
wrongdoing for years, and now, when the chips are down and they are required to
pay for their misdeeds, they simply do everything in their power to avoid the
likely consequence of their criminal actions.
The fine
is the largest ever retail banking penalty imposed by the authority - other
larger charges have related to trading scandals such as Libor benchmark
rate-rigging and foreign exchange rate manipulation. But fines are not a proper
penalty for board members who simply will not do what they are instructed to do
by their regulator. They have to be taught a hard and painful lesson, and we
should start by ejecting them from the financial sector for life. Fines are not
paid by these mafia goombahs personally, their impact falls entirely on the
shoulders of the shareholders of the bank, so other means have to be found to
name, shame and punish these organised criminals.
Lloyds
has been the worst-hit by the PPI mis-selling scandal, having set aside a total
of £12 billion out of a running total for the whole industry of £26 billion.
Georgina
Philippou, acting director of enforcement and market oversight at the FCA
offers the usual regulator-speak bromides by way of public statement. She is
reported to have said: "If trust in financial services is going to be
restored following the widespread mis-selling of PPI, then customers need to be
confident that their complaints will be treated fairly.
"The
size of the fine today reflects the fact that so many complaints were
mishandled by Lloyds.
"Customers
who had already been treated unfairly once by being mis-sold PPI were treated
unfairly a second time and denied the redress they were owed. Lloyds' conduct
was unacceptable."
Making
public utterances such as these go nowhere near defining the level of egregious
conduct or dishonest behaviour that Lloyds has engaged in.
Ms
Philippou frankly needs to rethink her approach to her role. If she honestly
believes, after all this time and evidence of concerted wrong-doing and
criminal damage that has been caused to the banking public that ‘trust in
financial services is going to be restored’, she is kidding herself. Trust in
banking will never be restored until the mafia bosses who are running these
organised crime families are brought low and gaoled, named and shamed for their
wilful failure to run decent and honest institutions.
Instead
what are we faced with? More public utterances which manage to diminish the
sheer scale of the wrong-doing to a level equivalent to cheating at Scrabble.
Mr
Horta-Osorio (Lloyds Bank CEO) said: "We made mistakes in our handling of
some PPI complaints. I am very sorry for this. We have been working hard with
the FCA to ensure all customers receive appropriate redress.
"That
process is now substantially complete. We remain fully committed to improving
our operational procedures and ensuring we do the right thing for our
customers."
Yeah,
yeah, yeah, yadda, yadda, yadda! It’s just the same old, same old, all over
again, until the next time. And there will be a next time, depend on it. These
banking crime gangs can’t make their numbers, and their executives cannot get
their obscene bonuses without committing major crimes. They are already proving
that as bank after bank cuts down on what were once big revenue generators, but
which are now, increasingly unprofitable business centres.
Today's
fine comes days after the Government fired the starting gun on a £4 billion
"Tell Sid"-style share sale to be launched within the next 12 months
as it seeks to sell off more of the taxpayer stake in Lloyds.
Lloyds
was rescued by the taxpayer at the height of the financial crisis, but the
Treasury's holding has since been shrunk from 43% to just under 19% as parcels
of it have been disposed of on the stock market.
The group
has faced a series of fines in recent years. Last July it was hit with
penalties totalling £218 million by the FCA and US regulators over benchmark
rate-rigging practices.
These
included an attempt to rip off the Bank of England over its financial life
support scheme, behaviour described as "highly reprehensible" by Bank
governor Mark Carney.
In
December 2013, Lloyds was fined £28 million over incentive schemes that
rewarded staff with "champagne bonuses" and put advisers under pressure
to hit sales targets or face demotion.
Lloyds
has a rap-sheet longer than that of Ronnie Kray!
They have
repeatedly committed gross financial crimes of every kind, and they keep on
getting fined for wrong-doing.
Not
that any of this seems to impact upon Mr Horta-Osorio? I don’t want to give the
impression that he has not been impacted by these fines, the chief executive’s
bonus was reduced, by about £360,000, but he could still be in line for a £4m
payout from bonuses awarded in 2012 and 2013 – the period when the bank was
found to be treating customers unfairly – and another £6.4m from a long-term
scheme.
A £10.4
million bonus, eh? That should take the sting out of any opprobrium he might
receive for treating his customers unfairly!
George
Osborne has gone on the record today saying the time for banker bashing is
over, that the banks have reformed and are operating under new rules!
He
is wrong, the leopards have not changed their spots, and they will continue to
rip off their customers at every opportunity. They can’t help it, it is
engrained in their DNA. We must continue to bash these bastards at every
possible opportunity!
No comments:
Post a Comment