Ian Fraser's new
book 'Shredded - Inside RBS - The bank that broke Britain' should become
required reading for every civil servant at H.M.Treasury, for every apparatchik
in the FCA, and for every politician whose brief engages with the City.
Ian lashes out with
fists crammed with facts, and his book leaves a wide variety of players badly
bruised and with reputations seriously diminished!
When I was a
detective at the Fraud Squad at New Scotland Yard, I had many opportunities to
investigate and evaluate the attitudes and business morality of City bankers and
other financial practitioners.
Between the years
1979 to 1986 I investigated the affairs of dishonest men (almost exclusively)
who believed that their positions in the City hierarchy made them immune from
the ordinary implications of the criminal law.
I also had a lot of
dealings with civil servants, mainly from the Department of Trade and Industry,
and I was constantly appalled by the lack of practical knowledge of the ways of
criminals that they brought to their role as regulators of the financial
sector.
I was shocked by
their arrogance, their insouciance, and the way that they believed that they
were an all-knowing source and fount of expertise, when in so many cases, they
were totally incompetent.
I rapidly came to
the conclusion that one of the reasons that so much crime flourished in the financial
sector was because the practitioners themselves believed that they were above
the law and would not be prosecuted, while those who existed to regulate their
activities, were largely useless and shockingly incompetent, but who knew that
if they waited long enough, and didn't rock the boat, a job would be found for
them in the financial community in the longer term.
Too many people in
the DTI regulatory divisions had become subject to a phenomenon called
'Regulator Capture', in which a cosy relationship was allowed to develop between
regulator and institution, and an unspoken agreement existed whereby both sides
knew that in return for studied non-intervention, employment rewards awaited
the compliant regulator!
Anyone who has
worked in the financial sphere for any time has known these features. Anyone
who has worked in the regulatory environment has seen the corrupt and corrosive
atmosphere they inculcate, and the wrong-doing that is allowed to proliferate.
I have worked in
this sphere for many years and I have seen all these phenomena and more, and,
as each new bank scandal, criminal act, scam and rip-off went by unmolested, I
had begun to despair that there would ever be a proper denouncing of the whole
rotten edifice.
Well, now, at last,
there is Ian Fraser's excoriating book, 'Shredded', and what amazing reading it
is. He unpicks with forensic care the entire diseased carcass of what was the
Royal Bank of Scotland, and he lays bare not only the bones of a once-great institution,
but he exposes the sociopathic behaviour of a CEO, Fred Goodwin, or 'Fred The
Shred', who presided over the denouement of this important bank.
In the telling of
the story, a Greek Tragedy emerges as the arrogance and hubris of Goodwin are
dissected and his ultimate downfall is foreseen!
But what makes this
book so compelling is how Fraser manages to demonstrate the way in which the
stage upon which Goodwin would tread his doomed existence, was prepared for him
by earlier failures to regulate the banking sector. I intend to quote from
selected paragraphs to illustrate this vitally important issue!
Talking about the
regime of regulation, Fraser points out how New Labour re-designed the Margaret
Thatcher model of financial regulation.
"...Brown and
his advisors including Balls and Steve Robson (senior civil servant in
H.M.Treasury who would later go on to a job with a major bank), decided
Thatcher's patchwork quilt of regulators would have to go...It had turned out
to be...incapable of preventing scams, financial disasters and
swindles..."
"...But as New
Labour's Financial Services and Markets Bill wended its way through Parliament,
concerted lobbying by banks...ensured that the new regulator had its wings
clipped before it had even hatched..."
Among its most
deviant legacies was the requirement
that the new regulator, the FSA "...must consider the international
mobility of the financial business before taking any enforcement action, and
avoid damaging the UK's competitiveness..."
There, in black and
white was the mantra which exonerated a new generation of incompetent
regulators, who could always pray in aid this stipulation as a justification
for doing nothing when the fight got hot and dirty!
Nick Cochan, a fine
journalist pointed out that this phrase put bankers above the law, where they
have remained until this day!
Another major
problem was Gordon Brown, who was described by Steve Robson as 'having no
interest in financial regulation'. Because Brown ignored it, the best and
brightest Treasury civil servants ignored it!
This is always the
problem with civil servants, they will look to see which issues their political
masters espouse and then commit themselves. The stage was being set under Brown
and Ed Balls for a regulatory-free zone in financial services, in a market run
by a group of financial great white sharks.
Blair was no better,
he was not interested in financial regulation either.
",,,In March
2003, the Blair Government indicated what sort of regulator it wanted when it
announced that former Barclays investment banker, Sir Callum McCarthy was taking
over as FSA chairman...On his watch the FSA succumbed to regulatory capture, not
least with the appointment of James Crosby of HBOS as a non-executive director..."
This period was
characterised by the emergence of 'light-touch regulation', a phrase which
became synonymous with 'no regulation at all'.
"...Blair, Brown and regulators like McCarthy had created an
environment in which financial firms...were pretty much above the law..."
As an epitaph for
the state of financial regulation at this time, the following paragraph sums up
the state of play in London at the start of the Great Financial Crisis.
"...In a memo
one former FSA senior executive revealed that between 2003 and 2008,
mid-ranking FSA staff were, for the miost part, incompetent, poorly qualified
and of too low a calibre to have any chance of reguating the financial services
sector. Others were too lazy and complacent to bother checking up on what
financial firms were doing. He added that none had the influence or the
inclination to challenge the pervading 'light touch, laissez-faire regulation'...
FSA supervision was hollowed out and its depleted ranks were staffed with
mediocre people who cared little about the business of supervising
firms..."
For years, people
like myself and Ian Fraser, Nick Cochan and others, have been identifying these
shortfalls and incompetencies. We have written about them, we have spoken on
public platforms, and all the while, we have been routinely ignored. My
evidence on this topic which I sent to the Parliamentary Commission on Banking
Culture and Standards was conveniently 'lost' by the Government servants, who
initially denied having received it, and then later, when admitting they had
had it all the time, said it had to be redacted (censored) because it contained
evidence the banks wouldn't like.
(Actually I rather
thought that was the whole point!)
Ian Fraser's
brilliant book deserves to be read by anyone who has any interest in
understanding why and how our financial services sector has been allowed to
become an organised criminal enterprise, run by a mob of mafia goombahs!
It is an important
piece of work because it throws down a heavy gauntlet to the financial
establishment and challenges them to pick it up and answer the charges it
contains. Ian has done what very few writers succeed in doing, he has
confronted the otherwise 'protected species' and laid bare their inadequacies.
They must respond or stand accused of craven complicity in assisting in a world
turned upside down!
3 comments:
Hi Boz. You're so right on the attitude of the regulator. In my SOCA days we strongly suspected that EDD on PEPs wasn't being taken seriously by many institutions and the FSA wasn't taking our concerns seriously. It wasn't until 2011 that they conducted a review of high risk ML situations and found that some big banks were not conducting satisfactory EDD (in some cases zero EDD) which was followed by mediocre fines.
It's insufficient to just make a phenomenal site or increase online networking supporters. Indeed, even chunks of extraordinary substance showed gladly on your site won't do the trap.Go for more details.. wordpress custom theme
I would like to say. I am Alina. I'm a law student. My last semester is running. This blog is really very interesting.
Source: hire a best academic writers
Post a Comment