Here's
to all you Bloggers, Tweeters and Face-Bookers out there. We have been posting
our messages that have been telling the City and its organised criminal mafia
gangs that we know all about their vicious games and we have put them on notice
that we are not going to give up all the while their supine regulators stay
asleep on the job, and continue to allow them to get on with their stealing,
cheating and lying!
We
have also sent strong messages to the Fantastically Supine Apologists that they
are not doing their job properly, and we have demanded that they raise their
game and start earning their copper-bottomed salaries.
We
must have been doing something very right because the call has gone out from
the Square Mile that they desperately need help to keep the banker bashers off
their case, and just in the nick of time, their friends who sup at their table,
immerse their snouts in their trough, or who, like the financial 'tick-birds'
they are, and who live a parasitical existence on the backs of the Banks and
the Hedge Funds, the Fund Managers and the Pension Fund providers, and all the
other bottom-feeders who inhabit the City, have started to come to their aid and
assistance.
The
City's wagons are circling and now the Square Mile's apologists are coming out
of the backwoods to lend their support.
This
is nothing new, in my first book 'Fraud In The City - Too Good To Be True,
published in 1986, I referred to that '...group of fellow-travelers to whom
the City could always turn for help and support and who could be relied upon to
call for a cessation of anti-City rhetoric, for fear that it would otherwise
result in damage to the City of London and its ability to earn money from
abroad...'
These
people were as predictable as a Swiss watch and they would begin by claiming
that such bad publicity was causing Britain to lose its pre-eminence in World
markets; that if we were not careful we would be overtaken by America or the
Far East (or, God help us, Germany); they would claim that whatever scandals
had happened, the market was bigger than the bad news, and that lessons had
been learned, reforms introduced, lines drawn in the sand and it was time to
move on, pull together, and generally do the right thing by the 'chaps' who
knew what was good for Britain.
The
Sunday Times pulled its wagon into the ring when it published a serious piece
of City apologia on 11th November reporting that '...London has lost its top spot as the world’s biggest financial centre by
jobs and will drop into third place by 2015. The City was narrowly ahead
of New York and Hong Kong on people employed last year, but will fall behind
the American financial centre this year. It will be overtaken by Hong Kong
within three years, with Singapore not far behind, according to the latest
forecasts from the Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR). The
consultancy said London was losing its dominance because of a “shift to the
east”, but it blamed “short-sighted over-regulation, penal taxation and banker
bashing” for accelerating the trend.
There you have this sort of crap in a nutshell. I mean you
couldn't make it up it is so predictable! And the causes, oh yes, you guessed;
'...over-regulation, taxation and banker-bashing...' I don't know who the CEBR
are, but couldn't these well-heeled guys have at least come up with something a
bit more fucking original?
Then, only yesterday, a true heavyweight in the shape of the
Confederation of British Industry pulled its wagon alongside, when John
Cridland, a man with a vast experience of really working in proper jobs was
forced to opine in the Times that a line needs to be drawn under the PPI scandal. He wants to see a statute of
limitations, to be backed by the Financial Services Authority (FSA), to cap the
time during which legal claims can be initiated.
Cridland has another bank-related worry. "Am I alone in my
concern about the recent high court ruling on the Guardian Care Homes
case?" he asks.
The reference is to a care homes company that says it was
wrongly mis-sold interest-rate swaps by Barclays. The ruling in question merely
allows the case to be heard, Lord Justice Flaux having decided that Barclays'
attempts to dismiss the Libor-rigging aspects were "wholly without
merit".
Cridland thinks that "government needs to be prepared to
step in to head off judge-led law if necessary", on the grounds that it
would be "a dangerous precedent" if banks were held responsible for
products sold that related to Libor.
This is really serious stuff, and is an attempt to get the
government to interfere with the ordinary course of the law and litigation
arising from criminal banking activities, but it demonstrates how far the
City's friends are prepared to go to protect their pals from censure. No doubt
the banks feel they have a right to expect the CBI to stand up for them,
considering how much they pay to belong to the CBI. Companies pay
subscriptions to the CBI based on their number of employees. Arguably, that
gives the banks – still very big employers – a very loud voice within the
organisation, and when the banks are paying and they say 'jump', they like
their paid lackeys to respond quickly!
And,
guess what, the City's apologists can now include the Prime MInister, David
Cameron among their supporters. Mr Cameron, who seems to have
conveniently forgotten his calls for major investigations into City wrongdoing,
and who is now a leading apologist and gung-ho, good-chaps syndrome, sort of
fellow, gave a warning on Monday night that
critics of the nation's banks "end up trashing Britain" as he mounted
a strong defence of the financial services industry.
Speaking
in the most opulent dining room of the Square Mile in his annual Guildhall
speech, the prime minister took a swipe at the likes of the Liberal Democrat
peer Lord Oakeshott, who regularly lambasts Britain's banks.
Cameron
acknowledged that "terrible mistakes" had been made in the City, but
he pointed out that financial services contributed an eighth of all government
revenue during the recession.
"...Yes,
some utterly terrible mistakes were made and they need to be addressed properly
so they can never happen again..," he told his City audience of bankers,
brokers, insurers, funny handshake makers, and people who get a thrill out of
dressing up in ritual medieval costumes. "...But those who think the answer
is just to trash the banks would end up trashing Britain. I say recognise the
enormous strength and potential of our financial sector, regulate it
properly and get behind it..."
Well,
you see Prime Minister, before we can give you the comfort of that support, the
thing is that we would just like you to address the issues which have led to
£18 billion worth of PPI financial crime in this country, before we start
getting all rosy-cheeked about the financial sector. If you think that these
can be wiped away by the phrase 'terrible mistakes', then you are proving that
you haven't got a fucking clue about what's going on and you are falling for
the same soft soap that all the rest of the apologists are sliding around
on.
We
would also like you to address the unquantifiable amount of fraud perpetrated
in the LIBOR manipulation cases, but if you think that the Wheatley proposals
are going to be a way of addressing the criminal actions properly, and
regulating the market properly, then you need to think again. You can't wash
this whole panoply of crime and sleaze away in between slurping down the soup
and fish, and if you think that by just calling for a cessation of trashing
bankers, that's going to prove your strength of leadership, you need to think
again mate!
Unless
you take these crimes seriously and make sure that the most egregious persons
involved in them get prosecuted, then they will happen again, and again and
anyone getting behind the financial sector in its present guise, is just going
to get sprayed in more shit!
I
heard this call so many times during the age of scandals in the 1970s and the
1980's and now we are hearing it again, and the message is still the same old,
same old! The only difference then was that we did at least manage to prosecute
a few fat cats, unlike to day where very few people get prosecuted for any kind
of crime in the financial sector at all. And all the time they keep refusing to
prosecute financial criminals the less they will be trusted
Only yesterday, the FSA announced that they
had issued a censure against Reverend
Carmel Jones, the head of the Pentecostal Credit Union, who was found to have
fallen short of standards required by the Financial Services Authority
in channeling money purportedly lent to the credit union’s members to
churches.
Tracey McDermott, FSA
director of enforcement and financial crime, said: “This is a disgraceful case
of a credit union putting the interests of another organisation before those of
its members. The FSA will not tolerate this conduct in the industry.
The Rev Jones should have
been prosecuted for theft of the monies, albeit he did not benefit from the
action himself, he nevertheless ignored previous warnings not to behave in this
way and has caused significant loss to the Credit Union. How does an
outcome like this send any messages to other potential wrong-doers?
Now we are looking at a
suggestion that dishonest practitioners have been manipulating gas charges and
cost rates, and the FSA has promised to investigate. I don't think anyone
should be holding their breath!
So, my message to you
Bloggers, Tweeters and Face-Bookers is keep on keeping on! Don't give up
because you think that your messages are not being heard. Together, we are far
more than the sum of our parts, and there are some very brave men and women out
there who have been cruelly traduced by the banking bastards, and who have been
let down by all the systems and controls allegedly put in place to help
ordinary people who find themselves in conflict with the financial sector, and
who only have the Internet to get their voices heard.
These people like Ashley
Smith, who never gives up and is a constant tower of strength, Caroline Barwick
who has fought like two people, Ian Fraser, who is an inspiration to us all, Philip
Duval who is the modern boy who pointed out that the Emperor wore no clothes,
Chris Cook who really gets this derivative stuff, and understands how the
energy crooks work; Golem XIV who hits hard, really hard, and my friend Carol
Harries who is an indefatigable letter writer and who manages to get her
correspondence into offices and onto desks of those who would rather she didn't
know their address, I salute you all, you are what makes it all worth while!
Respect!
..and respect to you Rowan! No plans to give up any time soon. Caroline
ReplyDeleteRowan
ReplyDeleteCan you put links on your website to those mentioned in last paragraph
Great stuff, Rowan.
ReplyDeleteAnother excellent missive Rowan - clearly you re not spending your evenings watching Coronation Street!
ReplyDeleteThe CBI commentary is so awful it is funny - sick funny. That stupid fuck-wit - an Antipodean expletive this ex-pat Brit has come to like is clearly very very stupid or in someone's pocket. (Sue me you prick if you don't like that.) How else can he explain that is time to draw a line under £18Billion of criminal activity - and this after LIBOR? Quite how he has the nerve to collect a pay check in these circumstances remains a mystery. Let's not forget he is merely protecting his members. I trust the non-criminal fraternity of the CBI send him an appropriate message.
Don't you just love JPMOrgan
ReplyDeletehttp://www.mfi-miami.com/2012/11/family-claims-jpmorgan-chase-killed-minister/
Hi Fatsnacker,
ReplyDeleteThis is the link to my blog
http://lifeafterdebts.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/placation-and-platitude.html
I have looked at your JP Morgan link. Clearly cruel and outrageous behaviour and I can only hope the victims are successful in bringing a case against these greedy banksters. There is no question about it. Riding roughshod over people costs the victims of the economic crisis their lives.
For those who want to read the people I admire, here are some contacts'
ReplyDeletehttp://www.ianfraser.org/
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/nov/13/energy-pricing-market-manipulation-whistleblower re Chris Cook
AbogadoNZ is here already as is lifeafterdebt.
The others are facebook mates.
www.golemxiv.co.uk
ReplyDeleteA fascinating insight by this blogger into the financial mess.
WWW.hat4uk.wordpress .com for another great read into the dysfunctional state we live in.
State Capture extends to the tax arena too. Let the little people pay http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmtreasy/memo/taxpolicy/m46.htm
ReplyDeleteRowan,
ReplyDeleteMore on the banks
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-15/ferc-suspends-jpmorgan-unit-s-power-trading-authority.html
"Cameron acknowledged that "terrible mistakes" had been made in the City, but he pointed out that financial services contributed an eighth of all government revenue during the recession."
ReplyDeleteAs Max kaiser pointed out to Kwasi Kwarteng on 23 Oct who offered the same pathetic excuse, it reminded him of the story of a man who went to the doctors and said "Doctor, my brother thinks he's a chicken". The doctor told the man to give his brother the appropriate medication to cure him. The man replied "But Doctor. You don't understand. We need the eggs."
Don't forget the lowlife lawyers who have been feeding at the banker's table for a long time too Rowan. I remember well the crap they and their friends threw at me when I (rightly) suggested that at least big six city law firms were engaged in money laundering. Talk about wagons circling and apologists coming out of the woodwork!
ReplyDeleteThank you Big Simon. I am with you all the way on the issue of the City lawyers. They are among the biggest parasites of all, and they have no consciences at all! I know because I worked in 2 City Law Firms for 10 years and I saw what can go on when men and women with no moral scruples get involved in the affairs of the Big Banks. In the end it was the banking lawyers that undermined my white collar crime and financial regulatory practice, and took away the support for my input because they argued that their banking clients found such a practice inside the firm, offensive, so I was invited to find another place to run my practice.
ReplyDelete